Chronicle survey: MOOCs: sizzle, steak or both?

Last month, a Tech Crunch article trumpeted a Chronicle of Higher Education survey that found 72% Of Professors Who Teach Online Courses Don’t Think Their Students Deserve Credit. It was a compelling story—and one that drew lots of social sharing and dire predictions about the imminent death of MOOCs.

But digging a little bit deeper, the story is more nuanced (isn’t it always?). The Chronicle piece on the survey, which evaluated responses from 103 professors who had taught a MOOC, was not nearly so dire. In fact, a surprising 79 percent of respondents felt that MOOCs were worth the hype, which is no small feat when you consider that the respondents were:

“…primarily longtime professors with no prior experience with online instruction. More than two-thirds were tenured, and most had taught college for well over a decade. The respondents were overwhelmingly white and male. In other words, these were not fringe-dwelling technophiles with a stake in upending the status quo.

Check out both the Tech Crunch and Chronicle pieces and see where you come down on all of this. Are MOOCs a not-worthy-of-credit flash in the pan, or do they have both sizzle and steak?

 

About Matt Cyr

Matt Cyr is the director of digital strategy at Northeastern University's College of Professional Studies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


1 + six =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Scroll To Top